Interactive video-based flipped classroom on student motivation and learning participation in islamic religious education

  • Zul Anwar 
    Educational Technology Program, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Hidayatullah Hidayatullah
    Educational Technology Program, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Indonesia
    Indonesia

Abstract

The integration of digital learning strategies in Islamic Religious Education is essential to meet the evolving educational demands of the digital era. This study investigates the effectiveness of an interactive video-based flipped classroom model in enhancing student motivation and learning participation among junior high school students. Rooted in the ARCS motivation model and engagement theory, the study adopts a quasi-experimental design using a Nonequivalent Control Group. A total of 60 eighth-grade students from Central Lombok, Indonesia, were divided into two groups: one experienced the flipped classroom with interactive video, and the other followed conventional instruction. Data were collected through validated motivation questionnaires and observation checklists based on Reeve & Tseng’s engagement indicators. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, were conducted to examine differences in outcomes. Findings show that students in the flipped classroom group exhibited significantly higher levels of motivation and learning participation compared to the control group. The most notable gains appeared in the “Confidence” dimension of motivation and across all four engagement types—behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic. The use of interactive videos allowed for better attention capture, relevance to students’ lives, and deeper reflective learning in religious contexts. These results affirm that an interactive video-based flipped classroom is not only pedagogically effective but also particularly suitable for value-oriented subjects like Islamic Religious Education. It supports a shift toward more reflective, participatory, and spiritually engaging learning processes.

Keywords
  • Flipped classroom, Interactive video, Islamic religious education
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345.
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2017). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Bhat, I. H. (2024). The impact of video-based learning on student engagement and motivation. In Innovation in the University 4.0 system based on smart technologies (pp. 39–53). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  4. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K–12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819.
  5. Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: A meta-analysis. Medical Education, 52(9), 910–924.
  6. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824.
  7. Cormier, D., & Voisard, B. (2018). Flipped learning and student motivation in secondary education. Educational Media International, 55(3), 210–225.
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
  9. DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151.
  10. Elmaadaway, M. A. N. (2018). The effects of a flipped classroom approach on class engagement and skill performance in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 560–575.
  11. Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205–209.
  12. Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J., Wang, H., & Zhang, M. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.
  13. Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.
  14. Jdaitawi, M. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom strategy on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 103–118.
  15. Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(7), 89–105.
  16. Kay, R., MacDonald, T., & DiGiuseppe, M. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471.
  17. Låg, T., & Sæle, R. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–17.
  18. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 1115–1137.
  19. Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 1–27.
  20. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in online learning. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222.
  21. Muhtifah, L., Mahrus, E., & Rahmiani, N. (2022). E-learning flipped classroom: Instituting an integrated Islamic education paradigm for character building. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 244–260.
  22. Ng, E. M. W. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for student learning. Computers & Education, 126, 65–74.
  23. Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925.
  24. Paristiowati, M., Fitriani, E., & Aldi, N. H. (2017). The effect of inquiry-flipped classroom model toward students’ achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 030112.
  25. Sahronih, S., Purwanto, A., & Sumantri, M. S. (2019). The effect of interactive learning media on students’ science learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (pp. 20–24).
  26. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
  27. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314.
  28. Sun, J. C. Y., & Wu, Y. T. (2016). Analysis of learning achievement and motivation in flipped learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 126–138.
  29. Syahid, A., & Bunyamin, A. (2025). The influence of the blended learning model on student interests faculty of Islamic religion. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(SI2), 299–307.
  30. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 101 times
PDF
: 42 times